SolutionsConflict checks
Automate conflict checks. Every name, every alias, every page.
Caddi reads every page of the complaint and exhibits, resolves each party's aliases, searches your matters, and cites every hit to the page it came from.
- 99%of agent runs complete successfully
- ~45 minon average to build your first agent
- 1M+back-office tasks completed
Plaintiff Calder Freight Inc. brings this action against Whitmore Holdings LLC. The funds were held at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and R. Okafor, its CFO, approved the transfer. Hale Shipping Co. carried the goods under a subcontract with Northwind Logistics LLC.
- Calder Freight Inc.No variants foundNo match anywhere, clear
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.“JP Morgan Chase” 94%Contact only, clear
- R. Okafor“Rita Okafor” 88%Witness in a 2017 memo, clear
- Hale Shipping Co.“Hale Shipping Company” 97%Prospect, no matter, clear
- Northwind Logistics LLC“Northwind Logistics” 98%Former client, 2019. To a reviewer
Firms running Caddi
01Reading
The search is fast. The reading takes the afternoon.
A new matter arrives as a complaint, exhibits, and corporate disclosures, and someone has to find every name in them before the database can be searched.
Where it lives today
- Complaint
- Exhibits A to F
- Corporate disclosure
- New matter memo
02The run
Every name found, every alias resolved.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase, and Chase are one party. Caddi resolves abbreviations, former names, and subsidiaries before it searches, so the hit spelled differently is not missed.
Caddi run
- Every page read for entitiesNetDocuments
- Aliases resolved, matters searchedIntapp
- Memo drafted with page citesMicrosoft 365
- Sent for partner reviewOutlook
Every hit cited to the page it came from
03Judgment
Party or scenery, decided and cited.
Each mention gets a role and a reason. The bank whose branch appears on page 14 is noted, not cleared, and the ambiguous ones go to a person.
- Also appears as
- JP Morgan Chase, JPM, Chase
- Role
- Adverse party
- Cited
- Complaint p. 2, Exhibit C p. 48
- Prior matters
- 2 found, both closed
- Chase branch, p. 14
- For reviewLocation only? Sent for review
From firms running Caddi
“With the last two cases that I tested, results were both good. In terms of the extraction, everything is good.”
“For us it was perfect. It didn't miss anything.”
Conflict checking workflows teams run on Caddi
See allCaddi
Turn an afternoon of reading into a few minutes
See Caddi run a conflicts check on your own complaint and exhibits, in a 30-minute walkthrough.
Or sign up free








