Caddi and Gumloop are both AI-native, but serve different buyers. Gumloop is a build-it-yourself canvas for hands-on builders. Caddi is an agentic automation platform: you record a workflow and Caddi writes, runs, and maintains it as code. Gumloop suits tinkerers; Caddi suits regulated ops teams in law and finance.
The core difference: build it, or have it built
With Gumloop, the value is the canvas, a flexible space to assemble AI steps and integrations yourself. With Caddi, the value is that you don't build: a non-technical staff member shows the work on a screen-share, and Caddi turns it into a maintained automation. AI does the understanding at setup; production runs on deterministic code.
Building on a canvas vs. recording it
Both are AI-native, but the path from idea to running automation is very different. Toggle between the two to compare what your team actually does.
- 1Screen-share the workflowA non-technical teammate demonstrates the task, no canvas, no node wiring.
- 2Caddi compiles it to deterministic codeAI is used only at setup to understand the task; production runs are predictable and auditable.
- 3It runs over your real stack70+ integrations including iManage, NetDocuments, Clio, Tamarac, and Addepar.
- 4Caddi keeps it runningMaintenance and edge cases are handled for you, no graph to babysit.
Caddi vs. Gumloop at a glance
| Gumloop | Caddi | |
|---|---|---|
| Build model | DIY AI canvas (wire nodes) | Record-to-code; an agent runs it |
| Who maintains it | You / your team | Caddi |
| Focus | Horizontal, all industries | Law & finance back office |
| Production runtime | AI steps run in the flow | Deterministic code; AI only at setup |
| Documents & email | Configurable nodes | Native varied-PDF & inbox handling |
| Integrations | Broad SaaS connectors | 70+ incl. iManage, NetDocs, Clio, Tamarac, Addepar |
How they score where it counts
Gumloop earns high marks for flexibility and breadth as a general-purpose canvas. Caddi is purpose-built for regulated verticals, so it leads on document handling, governance, and running unattended.
When Gumloop is the right call
Gumloop is a great pick if you have a hands-on builder who enjoys assembling workflows, you want a horizontal tool that spans many use cases and industries, and you're comfortable owning the build and maintenance yourself.
When Caddi is the right call
Caddi is the better fit if the process owner is non-technical, your highest-value work is regulated and document-heavy (intake, filing, PDF → system of record, triage), you need deep DMS / CRM / custodian integrations, and reliability plus SOC 2 audit trails are non-negotiable.
Which fits your situation?
Gumloop
A hands-on builder will get the most out of Gumloop's flexible canvas and broad connectors.
See Caddi side by side
Bring a workflow you'd build in Gumloop. Caddi will build it from a screen recording and run it across 70+ tools. See real examples or book a demo. For the wider landscape, see Gumloop alternatives.
Do more with less
See Caddi in action
Tell us where to reach you and the calendar opens right here. In 30 minutes we'll show you how Caddi automates the back-office work that grows with your clients—built, run, and maintained for you.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Caddi and Gumloop?
Gumloop is a horizontal, DIY AI-native canvas where you build and maintain workflows by wiring nodes. Caddi is vertical and agentic: you record a workflow, Caddi writes it as deterministic code, runs it over APIs, and maintains it. Caddi is built for regulated law and finance back offices with SOC 2 compliance and deep DMS/CRM integrations.
Is Caddi or Gumloop better for law firms and RIAs?
For regulated back-office work, Caddi is usually the better fit because it's purpose-built for law and finance, integrates with iManage, NetDocuments, Clio, Salesforce, Tamarac, and Addepar, runs deterministically in production, and is built and maintained for non-technical teams. Gumloop is strong for hands-on builders who want a general-purpose AI canvas.
Does Caddi use a canvas like Gumloop?
No. Rather than wiring a canvas, you screen-share the workflow and Caddi builds the automation for you, then maintains it. That removes the build-and-maintain burden of a DIY canvas.
Which is more reliable in production, Caddi or Gumloop?
Caddi runs automations as deterministic code in production, using AI only during setup to understand and replicate the workflow. That makes runs predictable and auditable, which matters for business-critical, regulated work.