Caddi vs. SubatomicCaddi finishes the back-office process instead of handing it back.
Subatomic's AI Chief of Staff leaves advisors briefs and drafts to approve. Caddi finds the repetitive back-office processes and runs them end to end, the same way every time.
- 99%of agent runs complete successfully
- ~45 minon average to build your first agent
- 1M+back-office tasks completed
Jason AlafganiUpdated Sep 23, 2026
A draft to approve is still work on someone's desk.
Account opening, a reconciliation, a change that has to reach four systems: these need to be finished, not prepped.
An AI Chief of Staff routes work to AI Co-Workers, who leave sourced briefs and drafts for a person to approve.
Runs the back-office process end to end on a trigger, across your tools, with nobody at the keyboard.
The two-hundredth run should look exactly like the first.
Operations repeats the same process hundreds of times a week, and any variation between runs is what compliance ends up chasing.
Co-Workers reason over the Subatomic IQ knowledge graph to produce each piece of work, a strong fit for open-ended jobs like meeting prep.
Fixed steps run as code the same way every time, with AI only on judgment steps such as reading a document. Caddi has completed 1M+ back-office tasks.
Nobody has a list of where the ops hours go.
The re-keying, the status chasing and the form prep are spread across inboxes, the CRM and spreadsheets.
Offers a Busywork Audit, and the Chief of Staff decides what matters each day.
Discover reads email, the CRM and spreadsheets and ranks the repetitive work by hours. The person who does each process then builds it in chat or on a screenshare.
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddi an alternative to Subatomic?
For much of the same busywork, with a different design. Subatomic sells an AI workforce: an AI Chief of Staff reads your CRM, custodians, planning software and documents through a knowledge graph it calls Subatomic IQ, decides what matters, and routes the work to specialist AI Co-Workers, who leave drafts and briefs for a person to approve. Caddi finds the repetitive back-office processes, has the person who does each one build it by showing it once, and runs it as verified code with every run logged.
Which is more reliable for high-volume operations work?
For a process you want done the same way every time, such as reconciliation, account opening or a change propagated to every system, Caddi runs the fixed steps as code and uses AI only for the judgment steps inside a run, each one scoped and logged. Subatomic's Co-Workers reason on your data to produce their work, which suits open-ended jobs like a meeting brief or a reply to a client question. The more a task repeats, the more deterministic execution matters.
What does each one produce?
Subatomic's Chief of Staff produces a morning of finished work for advisors: a sourced brief, drafted replies, prepped meetings and pending changes waiting for approval. Caddi produces running automations for the operations team: named processes that run on a trigger across your tools, with a record of every run.
Does Caddi build a knowledge graph of the firm?
No. Caddi does not build a firm-wide knowledge graph or a chat assistant over it. Discover reads your tools to find and rank the repetitive work, and each automation connects to the systems its process touches.
Is Subatomic ever the better choice?
Yes, when the goal is to give advisors an assistant that works their book overnight and hands them sourced briefs and drafts to approve. Caddi is the better fit for the operations processes behind the advisor that should run end to end the same way every time.
Can I try Caddi without a sales call?
Yes. The Individual plan is free and includes Discover and Automate. Govern, the firm-wide view, starts on the Team plan.