Caddi vs. SubatomicSubatomic's AI workforce reasons through every task. Caddi uses AI only where it's needed and runs the rest as code.
When a model reasons through every step, the same task can come out differently from run to run. Caddi runs your back-office process the same way on run 4,000 as on run 1, and your team can open any run to see every step.
- 99%of agent runs complete successfully
- ~45 minon average to build your first agent
- 1M+back-office tasks completed
The two-hundredth run should look exactly like the first.
Operations repeats the same process hundreds of times a week, and any variation between runs is what compliance ends up chasing.
Co-Workers reason over the Subatomic IQ knowledge graph to produce each piece of work, a strong fit for open-ended jobs like meeting prep.
Fixed steps run as code the same way every time, with AI only on judgment steps such as reading a document. Caddi has completed 1M+ back-office tasks.
A draft to approve is still work on someone's desk.
Account opening, a reconciliation, a change that has to reach four systems: these need to be finished, not prepped.
An AI Chief of Staff routes work to AI Co-Workers, who leave sourced briefs and drafts for a person to approve.
Runs the back-office process end to end on a trigger, across your tools, with nobody at the keyboard.
Built for RIAs from $1B to $600B.
At that size the same process runs across many teams, custodians and systems, and operations has to show what happened on every account. What works for one practice strains across a whole firm.
Its public proof point is a single wealth practice, where the AI workforce took on a few roles' worth of work in its first year.
Caddi's RIA customers manage from $1B to $600B in assets. Discover ranks the repetitive work firm-wide, and Govern shows every automation by team and owner, every run on the record.
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddi an alternative to Subatomic?
For much of the same busywork, with a different design. Subatomic sells an AI workforce: an AI Chief of Staff reads your CRM, custodians, planning software and documents through a knowledge graph it calls Subatomic IQ, decides what matters, and routes the work to specialist AI Co-Workers, who leave drafts and briefs for a person to approve. Caddi finds the repetitive back-office processes, has the person who does each one build it by showing it once, and runs it as verified code with every run logged.
Which is more reliable for high-volume operations work?
For a process you want done the same way every time, such as reconciliation, account opening or a change propagated to every system, Caddi runs the fixed steps as code and uses AI only for the judgment steps inside a run, each one scoped and logged. Subatomic's Co-Workers reason on your data to produce their work, which suits open-ended jobs like a meeting brief or a reply to a client question. The more a task repeats, the more deterministic execution matters.
What does each one produce?
Subatomic's Chief of Staff produces a morning of finished work for advisors: a sourced brief, drafted replies, prepped meetings and pending changes waiting for approval. Caddi produces running automations for the operations team: named processes that run on a trigger across your tools, with a record of every run.
Does Caddi build a knowledge graph of the firm?
No. Caddi does not build a firm-wide knowledge graph or a chat assistant over it. Discover reads your tools to find and rank the repetitive work, and each automation connects to the systems its process touches.
What size of firm is each built for?
Subatomic's public proof point is a single wealth practice, where its AI workforce took on a few roles' worth of work in the first year. Caddi's RIA customers manage from $1B to $600B in assets, where the same process runs across many teams, custodians and systems and operations needs one view of every automation and a record of every run.
Is Subatomic ever the better choice?
Yes, when the goal is to give advisors an assistant that works their book overnight and hands them sourced briefs and drafts to approve. Caddi is the better fit for the operations processes behind the advisor that should run end to end the same way every time.
Can I try Caddi without a sales call?
Yes. The Individual plan is free and includes Discover and Automate. Govern, the firm-wide view, starts on the Team plan.
Caddi vs. Mili
Caddi vs. PitCrew
Caddi vs. Humanity Labs
- Akai by Deel (compare with Caddi)
Caddi vs. Worktrace
Caddi vs. Nevis
Caddi vs. Feathery
Caddi vs. Harvey AI
Caddi vs. ChatGPT
Caddi vs. Microsoft 365 Copilot
Caddi vs. Claude
Agentforce (compare with Caddi)
Power Automate (compare with Caddi)
Caddi vs. Zapier
Caddi vs. UiPath
Caddi vs. Gumloop
Caddi vs. n8n
Make (compare with Caddi)
Caddi vs. Automation Anywhere
Caddi vs. Certinia
Caddi vs. ServiceNow
Appian (compare with Caddi)
Caddi vs. Pega
Caddi vs. Workato
Caddi vs. Tungsten Automation
Caddi vs. Hyperscience
Caddi vs. ABBYY
Caddi vs. Mendix
Caddi vs. OutSystems
Caddi vs. Celonis
Power Automate Process Mining (compare with Caddi)
UiPath Process Mining (compare with Caddi)
Caddi vs. Skan.ai
Caddi vs. Mimica
SAP Signavio (compare with Caddi)
- KYP.ai (compare with Caddi)
IBM Process Mining (compare with Caddi)